I advised decision-making in tender processes for critical infrastructure linked to the energy transition, in a context of high regulatory exposure and multiple actors with different incentives.
The challenge was not technical or legal in itself, but structuring a decision in which operational, regulatory and institutional variables intersected, with systemic implications.
My role was to structure that decision process, anticipate risks and align with regulators and key actors so complex projects could continue moving forward in a highly uncertain environment.
OutcomeCritical infrastructure projects continued moving forward in an adverse regulatory environment, with systemic risks contained and relationships with regulators preserved.