Strategic Advisory — MMXXVI Chile · Latin America · United States
Consuelo Mengual
Strategic Advisory

I work with executive teams and boards on the analysis and decision-making, in contexts where strategy, regulation and institutional factors intersect with the business.

She simplifies complex problems, gets to the heart of the issue and separates what matters from what does not.

01 — Profile

From executive leadership to strategic advisory.

Consuelo Mengual

Complex decisions are not resolved by looking at a single dimension. They unfold at the intersection of strategy, regulation and institutional context.

With over 20 years in legal and executive roles in highly complex environments — energy, mining and infrastructure — my practice was built from within: as General Counsel of the Coordinador Eléctrico Nacional and in senior roles at BHP and Carey, across Chile, Latin America and the United States. Today I advise from the outside, with the distance and judgment that allows.

02 — Advisory

Areas of advisory.

I advise on decisions where knowing the rule is not enough. What makes the difference is reading the full context, structuring tensions, identifying what matters most and helping the organization take a position with judgment, timing and institutional awareness.

Scenario analysis

I work with executive teams and boards on building and reading scenarios for high-uncertainty decisions. The focus is not on predicting, but on structuring the variables that matter, anticipating consequences and broadening the field of vision before committing to a course of action.

Board advisory

I work with boards on complex decisions, bringing experience in highly regulated environments and a perspective shaped by board practice as well.

A relevant part of the work is integrating strategy with the environment in which the decision is made, including alignment with key actors and leading conversations that allow the decision to hold over time.

Corporate governance and decision architecture

Advisory on the design and strengthening of governance structures, authority frameworks, conflict management, reporting lines and decision spaces, so that governance works in practice and not only on paper.

Regulatory navigation and stakeholder engagement

I work on decisions where reading the regulation is not enough. It also matters to understand the environment, build bridges across actors with different logics and sustain complex conversations with legitimacy.

03 — Voices

What others see when working with me.

“She simplifies complex problems, gets to the heart of the issue and separates what matters from what does not.”

“She has the ability to assess the full picture before deciding, which reduces anxiety and builds confidence.”

“A strategic and decisive leader, capable of handling critical challenges.”

“The best person to have by your side when looking for solutions in complex contexts.”

04 — How I work

Each mandate is different. The method is not.

Context conversation first

Everything starts by understanding the real situation, not the one described in the first email. Before proposing, I take time to read the context and locate where the decision really lies.

Focused and direct mandates

Mandates with a defined scope or ongoing low-friction advisory. In both cases, the dialogue is direct, without intermediary teams or layers.

Applied judgment

The value lies not only in analysis, but in the ability to take a position. I bring a full reading of the situation and the judgment needed to move forward, sustaining it until the decision is made. The format — conversation, document or presentation — depends on the mandate.

Perspective

In demanding organizations, the pace of day-to-day work leaves little room to stop and see the full picture. I contribute from the outside a view that complements internal knowledge and helps structure the decision.

05 — Cases

What this looks like in practice.

This experience comes from real decisions involving critical infrastructure, regional expansion, strategic contracts and environments where regulation, operations and governance could not be viewed separately.

Case 01

Infrastructure processes in a high-tension regulatory environment

I advised decision-making in tender processes for critical infrastructure linked to the energy transition, in a context of high regulatory exposure and multiple actors with different incentives.

The challenge was not technical or legal in itself, but structuring a decision in which operational, regulatory and institutional variables intersected, with systemic implications.

My role was to structure that decision process, anticipate risks and align with regulators and key actors so complex projects could continue moving forward in a highly uncertain environment.

OutcomeCritical infrastructure projects continued moving forward in an adverse regulatory environment, with systemic risks contained and relationships with regulators preserved.

Case 02

Market entry into Latin America

I advised the definition and execution of market entry strategy across the region, in a long-term exploration and expansion context.

The decision required integrating legal, operational and local stakeholder variables across different institutional settings and with significant levels of uncertainty.

My contribution was to advise from an integrated perspective, structuring legal strategy as an enabler of the business decision rather than a later-stage element.

OutcomeEntry into new markets was executed with legal and operational architecture integrated from the outset, avoiding late-stage corrections and decisions driven by urgency.

Case 03

Strategic review of critical supply contracts

I advised the review of contractual and dispute resolution strategy in strategic supply contracts, in a context of significant economic exposure.

The challenge was to redefine a position that directly affected significant costs for the organization, with operational and reputational implications.

My role was to contribute to an integrated legal, operational and negotiation strategy that allowed the organization to reposition itself and secure meaningful improvements in contractual terms.

OutcomeThe organization was repositioned with strategic counterparties and achieved a material improvement in its contractual terms.

06 — Experience

The experience that grounds the practice.

2026 — Present

Fundación Familias Primero

Board Member

Santiago, Chile

Member of the board of a foundation focused on parental tools and reading promotion in early childhood, with impact in vulnerable communities.

2019 — 2025

Coordinador Eléctrico Nacional

General Counsel

Santiago, Chile

Led the legal function of the independent operator of the national electricity system, reporting to the Executive Director and working directly with the Board. Principal legal counterpart to authorities and regulators.

  • Advised executive leadership and the Board on high-pressure decisions with no obvious answers, balancing operational continuity with regulatory and reputational risk.
  • Led tenders and contracting for infrastructure and operational projects worth more than USD 1 billion per year, with direct impact on long-term costs and system resilience.
  • Leadership in an environment of high public and institutional exposure, critical to the continuity of the national power system.
2015 — 2019

BHP

Manager, Legal — Minerals Americas (2017–2019)
Legal Counsel — Copper Operations (2015–2017)

Santiago, Chile

Senior legal roles in large-scale industrial operations and strategic projects across Latin America, working directly with operations, supply, energy and HR teams.

  • Advised senior leadership on high-value contracts and energy and infrastructure sourcing processes with major economic impact.
  • Regulatory compliance and dispute management in a multinational and regional context.
  • Legal strategy for regional expansion initiatives, including entry into new markets in Latin America.
2009 — 2015

Carey

Senior Associate — Corporate, Energy and Natural Resources

Santiago, Chile

Advised multinational clients on corporate, commercial and regulatory matters, as well as M&A transactions linked to energy, mining and infrastructure projects.

2012 — 2013

Dechert LLP

International Visiting Associate — Capital Markets

New York, USA

Capital markets transactions for Latin American issuers, including bond issuances and ADR offerings in the United States.

2006 — 2009

Claro y Compañía

Associate — Litigation and Regulation

Santiago, Chile

Antitrust, civil liability and regulatory litigation, with participation in due diligence processes and corporate transactions.

07 — Credentials

Distinctions, education and leadership.

Distinctions
Mujeres Empresarias & El Mercurio

100 Women Leaders of Chile — Executive Category

National recognition highlighting leadership, professional trajectory and impact in senior executive roles.

2023
The Legal 500

GC Power List Chile

Recognized consecutively among the most influential in-house legal leaders in Chile.

2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025
Idealis & Diario Financiero

Leading In-House Lawyer under 45

Recognition for influence, leadership and contribution to the evolution of the in-house legal role in Chile.

2023 · 2024
Education
2011 — 2012

Columbia University — School of Law

LL.M.

New York, USA
2022 — 2023

ESE Business School

Advanced Management Program (AMP)

Advanced Management · Santiago & Barcelona
2000 — 2004

Universidad de Chile — Facultad de Derecho

Law Degree

Highest distinction · Admitted to the Bar by the Supreme Court of Chile (2007)
2021

Mujeres Empresarias & Cambridge Business Association

Board of Women (BOW) — Senior Leadership

Santiago, Chile
Leadership & social commitment
2022 — Present

Abogadas In-House Chile

Co-founder and Mentor

Professional network of more than 900 members
2026 — Present

Fundación Familias Primero

Board Member

Parental tools and reading promotion
08 — Contact

Let’s talk.

Every important decision starts with a conversation that helps clarify the problem.

© MMXXVI Consuelo Mengual Strategic Advisory